W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: question about canvas survey and issue 131

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:16:46 -0400
Message-ID: <4CB7571E.6000705@intertwingly.net>
To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
CC: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
On 10/14/2010 03:05 PM, Cynthia Shelly wrote:
> I have a question for the chairs about the survey on Issues 74 and 105
> with respect to issue 131.
>
> As I understand the issues, question #4 on the survey [1], “Objections
> to adding advisory text explaining how to use the focus rect API for
> efficient caret position notification, and change nothing else?” is a
> counter-proposal to the proposal covered in 131 [2] to add a caret API
> and focus rectangle handling. It seems odd to me to survey question 4
> now, while deferring the proposal it counters. Perhaps we should include
> question 4 in issue 131 and remove it from the current survey?

Anybody object to me taking question 4 off of the survey and 
incorporating it into the resolution of issue 131?

> Thanks,
>
> Cynthia
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 19:17:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:15 GMT