W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Issue-85 (was: ISSUE-129: replace or modify the ARIA section of the HTML5 spec)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:33:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4CB4476C.6040503@intertwingly.net>
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 10/12/2010 05:01 AM, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> ISSUE-129: replace or modify the ARIA section of the HTML5 spec [HTML 5 spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/129
>
> Raised by: Steve Faulkner
> On product: HTML 5 spec

Thanks!

What is the status of:

a) Bug 8000.  You have a change proposal, for which a request was issued 
for you to update it, and you indicated that you do no plan to pursue 
it.  Yet you referenced it recently in the bug itself.  Do you plan to 
update the change proposal as requested, or should this bug be CLOSED?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8000
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAonanchor
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0555.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jul/0022.html

b) Bug 9871.  Editor's response was given in August.  Should this bug be 
CLOSED or added to ISSUE-129 or pursued as a separate issue?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9871

c) Bug 9872.  Should this bug be CLOSED?  The Bug triage sub-team 
indicated that they accept closing this bug as is.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9872

d) Bug 9936.  Current status is NEEDSINFO and the Bug triage sub-team 
says that it is not high enough of a priority

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9936

e) ISSUE-85 anchor-roles.  Should this be CLOSED as being superseded by 
ISSUE-129, or rescoped?

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 11:33:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:15 GMT