- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:34:36 -0400
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 10/8/10 1:31 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > Would Gecko run scripts without the "ordered" property as soon as they > were ready? Yes. > Wouldn't that break the sites that are using the existing > version of labjs? Yes, which is why in the short term Gecko is doing the willful spec violation thing. Then we'd ship a version that has "ordered" _and_ the spec violation. Then we'd ship a version that just does "ordered" and hope/push for sites to update to a working labjs. > I guess I don't see the connection between the first part of Henri's > message, where he talks about legacy UA-sniffing code that's blocking > him from implementing something in the spec, and the second part of > Henri's message, where he proposes a new feature to make new code more > awesome. The second part is a way to, not today but next year, eliminate the code that is talked about in the first part. -Boris
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 17:35:11 UTC