- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:37:15 +0100
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Leif Halvard Silli" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Philip Taylor" <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, "HTMLwg WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:31 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >> Also, do we really still need to have arguments over why >> transitional doctypes are bad (they trigger an inferior rendering >> mode for one) and why presentational markup is to be avoided? > > I think I understand the value of avoiding quirks mode and almost > standards mode, enough to explain it. I'm not sure I understand fully > why presentational markup is to be avoided. Can you provide some > reasons or point to a good reference? > > I ask because I'm planning to make a wiki page that collects > rationales for authoring conformance requirements. Ian posted about this a while back: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0961.html -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 10:38:10 UTC