- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:51:29 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/15/2010 07:05 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > We have a change proposal to replace the object fallback example with > > one that demonstrates best practice: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1107.html > > > > At one time, we had a second proposal, but as it has been withdrawn at > > the present time we have no active counter proposals. Accordingly, the > > chairs are issuing a call for consensus at this time. If there are no > > objections, we will adopt this change proposal on June 22, 2010. > > There was no objection, so this Call for Consensus has passed. > > Ian, could you please update the draft Replace the example provided in "The > param Element" section (currently section 4.8.5) with the text provided in the > change proposal? Done, more or less. (I had to change the example a bit to have conforming alternative text that was actually accessible, rather than the text in the suggested example which was really a caption; I made some changes to the spacing; and I changed the example's prose a little to be actually plausible as a real Web page. It would be helpful if the chairs could check the quality of proposed changes themselves so that I don't have to make these kinds of changes when the decisions are made, since having to do them myself means I run the risk each time of making a change that is then not in what the chairs consider the spirit of the decision, and then we have to do it all over again.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 06:51:59 UTC