Re: <figure> bugs in Differences document from Anne van Kesteren on 2010-06-23 (public-html@w3.org from June 2010)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:52:17 +0200
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Leif Halvard Silli" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.verfpfge64w2qv@annevk-t60>

On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:02:56 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli  
<xn--mlform-iua@målform.no> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren, Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:59:44 +0200:
>> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:27:09 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli:
>>> Bug 4: It is does not reflect HTML5 to present <figure> as a a way
>>>        to provide captions for embedded content. (It does however
>>>        match Shelley's change proposal before she changed it to a
>>>        proposal to remove <figure>.
>>> Request: Describe what <figure> is meant for.

My bad. I thought this comment was about the example. It seems however it  
was about the text which indeed needed updating. Now done.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 15:53:17 UTC