W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: <figure> bugs in Differences document

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:21:23 +0200
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100624002123013538.5c618bba@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Anne van Kesteren, Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:52:17 +0200:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:02:56 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli 
> <xn--mlform-iua@målform.no> wrote:
>> Anne van Kesteren, Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:59:44 +0200:
>>> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:27:09 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli:
>>>> Bug 4: It is does not reflect HTML5 to present <figure> as a a way
>>>>        to provide captions for embedded content. (It does however
>>>>        match Shelley's change proposal before she changed it to a
>>>>        proposal to remove <figure>.
>>>> Request: Describe what <figure> is meant for.
> 
> My bad. I thought this comment was about the example. It seems 
> however it was about the text which indeed needed updating. Now done.

That's why Sam encouraged you to read. ;-) Very well!
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 22:21:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:10 GMT