- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:36:52 +0300
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Jun 15, 2010, at 21:31, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/15/2010 02:13 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> Here's a counter-Change Proposal: >> >> Rationale >> >> To put spec readers ahead of theoretical purity, spec references >> should be followable in a browser without paywalls when feasible. In >> the case of ASCII, it is feasible. >> >> Details >> >> The reference for ASCII must not be to a document that cannot be >> obtained as plain text, HTML or PDF free of charge without a wrapper >> format (such as zip) by issuing an HTTP GET request. The reference >> should be to any resource, at the editor's discretion, that describes >> ASCII and that can be obtained as plain text, HTML or PDF free of >> charge without a wrapper format (such as zip) by issuing an HTTP GET >> request. > > The above does not meet the criteria for a change proposal. Specifically[1]: > > Proposal Details: This may take one of the following four forms: [...] > * With prior permission from the chairs, a high-level prose > description of the changes to be made. I request permission to submit the above as 'high-level prose'. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 06:37:27 UTC