- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: <public-html@w3.org>
Laura Carlson wrote: > > > This is very true. One example: the image analysis paragraph remains > in the WHATWG > version plus added comments: The WHATWG document also makes references to the newly invented "WebSRT" time-stamp format (a format that currently does not appear to have any implementation, authoring tools, or support from any commercial video producer), and has added a <track> attribute that is still under discussion at the W3C. I think it is important to highlight these differences and be transparent about it. JF
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 16:16:45 UTC