W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

RE: preparing WD publication

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 07:02:55 -0700
To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D23D6B9E57D654429A9AB6918CACEAA97D2103D3C3@NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com>
I think that any references to the WHATWG "version" of the document should be removed from W3C communications and documents.  It's confusing and misleading.

Leonard

-----Original Message-----
From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 9:24 AM
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Subject: preparing WD publication

On 08.06.2010 15:18, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> ...
> It does not talk about the specification. It talks about the
> specification draft _text_ and specifically says "amongst others". Seems
> perfectly clear to me.

"The latest stable version of the editor's draft of this specification 
is always available on the W3C CVS server and in the WHATWG Subversion 
repository."

This implies that the WHATWG repository contains the latest draft of the 
W3C HTML5 spec. This is not true; it contains stuff that the WG has 
decided should not be part of the spec.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 16:15:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:09 GMT