Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > Also note that if we do > > <figure role="img"> > <img src="image" role="presentation" > > <summary>Description</summary> > </figure> > > then <figure>, just like the WAI-ARIA example, groups *two* elements - > <summary> and <img>. > Just a clarification before people get confused: It's figcaption, not summary. The summary element is in details. Shelley > PS: We really *must* define <figure> so that it - in general - is > unnecessary to use aria-labelledby for designating the caption. Just as > for the <caption> of <table>, it should be self evident what <figure>'s > caption element is captioning. > I believe this was the intent for UAs: that figcaption be treated like table caption, except figcaption allows markup. > And this begs the question: What role does <table>'s <caption> element > have? The best match I could find was the abstract role "sectionhead": > [1] > > ]] > A structure that labels or summarizes the topic of its related section. > ]] > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#sectionhead > > Leif > > ShelleyReceived on Monday, 7 June 2010 19:52:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:09 GMT