W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:00:32 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLfhzBN6c-YvUbdfBLuE3uyc11suTWF7rTK8IX@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi John,

>> The decisions documents did a good job of detailing rationale for most
>> of the survey comments. However, it might help if more discussion on
>> specific points raised in change proposals/counter proposals
>> themselves had been provided.
>
> Isn't that the point of this mailing list? To have discussions?

Yes. Of course.

The point of the chairs decision documents are to provide a decision.
They did that. But the chairs didn't address or discuss points Shelley
raised in her change proposals. If the chairs could do that, it might
avoid a formal objection. I don't know.

Best Regards,
Laura
-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 20:01:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC