W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2010

RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: "'John Foliot'" <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'Shelley Powers'" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
Cc: "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009f01cb041e$b0c1ec20$1245c460$@edu>
Apologies, as the very long URLS in my previous note appear to have been 
joined. The 2 URLs should have been:

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/KeepNewElements#The_use_of_semantically_rich_elements_is_an_expressed_desire_of_the_W3C_Accessibility_.28WAI.29_community



http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/KeepNewElements#The_HTML_WG.27s_Accessibility_Task_Force_opposes_the_removal_of_these_elements.2C_attributes.2C_and_controls


JF
Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 19:47:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:09 GMT