W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2010

Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:50:19 +0200
To: "Andrei Popescu" <andreip@google.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vggd1pka64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:21:29 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>  
> wrote:
>> But I am not sure I understand what prevents you from doing both. You
>> can render your two buttons for the existing millions of pages. If
>> some new pages do specify the capture parameter, you can just hide the
>> irrelevant button. What is the drawback to that?
>
> That could be an ok solution I agree.

It seems better to me to start out simple first. Like Jonas I'm not too  
convinced the capture parameter is really justified.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 13:51:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC