W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-80

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:30:01 -0700
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <0FFC1073-2F18-45B9-A398-C82687C704FF@apple.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>

The Chairs would like to see this update by July 15th.

 - Maciej

On Jun 23, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> 
> On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> 
>>> This change proposal contains an objection to another change proposal. 
>>> That objection will prove helpful at the later stages in the resolution 
>>> of this issue.  Meanwhile, this change proposal needs to be updated in 
>>> order to provide rationale for the current text
>> 
>> As with the other null change proposals, it's unclear exactly which text 
>> it is you believe needs justifying. Could you clarify this request, 
>> ideally by quoting the text from the spec that you believe needs 
>> justification in this issue?
> 
> The Change Proposal for ISSUE-80 proposes striking the following content from the spec:
> 
> --------
> (under "Images whose contents are not known"):
> <li>The <code title=attr-title><a href="dom.html#the-title-attribute">title</a></code> attribute is present and has a non-empty value.</li>
> 
> and (under "4.8.1.1.14 Guidance for conformance checkers"):
> 
> <li>The <codetitle=attr-title><a href="dom.html#the-title-attribute">title</a></code> attribute is
> present and has a non-empty value (as <a href="#unknown-images">described above</a>).</li>
> ---------
> 
> Rationale for these clauses in their two respective places should be provided. Note: this overlaps with Laura's Change Proposal for ISSUE-31, which suggests multiple changes, including one of the above two changes. The Chairs may reconsider how best to present these questions to the Working Group as the current set of issues does not seem to align very well with the set of independent questions.
> 
> Regards,
> Maciej
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 09:30:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:18 UTC