W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83

From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:13:24 -0000
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u6jpgm2ch8on37@bruce-pc>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:32:09 -0000, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

  If I were forced to chose
> (e.g. if the chairs said the exact names were a matter of editorial
> discretion) then at the moment I would likely pick <figcaption> for
> <figure> (with deference to <optgroup>) and either <dsummary> or  
> <summary>
> for <details>.

Out of interest (I don't have an agenda) wouldn't you mint the same  
element for both purposes (as you did with legend and dd/dt?)

Bruce Lawson
Web Evangelist
www.opera.com (work)
www.brucelawson.co.uk (personal)
www.twitter.com/brucel
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 23:14:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT