- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:19:18 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
I haven't had time to look at the technical aspects of this draft, but as a matter of principle I support the publication of this draft. / Jonas On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Hey folks, > > The heartbeat draft for the RDFa spec for HTML should be published by > January 15th, 2010. I have made some of the additions that WHAT WG, RDFa > TF and HTML WG folks have requested: > > * Updating HTML5 coercion to Infoset rules (normative) > * Clarifying how to extract RDFa attributes via Infoset (informative) > * Clarifying how to extract RDFa attributes via DOM2 (informative) > > I can't imagine that this draft is going to make people happy on either > side of the debate for the following reasons: > > * Updating the HTML5 coercion to Infoset rules needs input from > implementers and may be a non-starter. > * Some believe that there is no need to state anything about Infoset or > DOM2, others believe that it should be normative language. I have > stated how to extract RDFa information in both Infoset and DOM2, but > left the language as informative. > > Feedback on the current draft would be appreciated: > > http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html > > Diff-marked version: > > http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa-diff-20091015-20100115.html > > This is a request for the HTML WG to publish this draft as a heartbeat > draft effective Friday, January 15th, 2010. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Monarch - Next Generation REST Web Services > http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/12/14/monarch/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:20:14 UTC