W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:05:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4B46E75F.30908@gmx.de>
To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
CC: Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>, HTMLwg WG <public-html@w3.org>

Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> ...
> To get the first frame and duration for Ogg Theora, you must make at 
> least 2 HTTP requests to get the beginning and end of the file (unless 
> the X-Content-Duration header is used, in which case 1 would suffice). 
> ...

Out of curiosity, exactly what HTTP requests are these?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 08:06:36 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philip Jägenstedt: "Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state?"
Previous message: Philip Jägenstedt: "Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft"
In reply to: Philip Jägenstedt: "Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state?"
Next in thread: Philip Jägenstedt: "Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state?"
Reply: Philip Jägenstedt: "Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT