W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:30:52 +0100
To: "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
Cc: "Aryeh Gregor" <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, robert@ocallahan.org, Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>, "Jeremy Keith" <jeremy@adactio.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u52ahqcv64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:08:29 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer  
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd actually like to chip in here - I was rather offended by the
> remark that authors cannot be trusted. While there are many authors
> out there that really don't know what they are doing, there are many
> that do. Standards are not written for those that don't know what they
> are doing - those people don't care one way or another anyway. But we
> write these standard for those that know what they are doing to enable
> them to give good markup to the browser, which it turn enables the
> browsers to do the right thing.

Actually, standards are written for both audiences. That is why we have  
e.g. defined graceful error handling in CSS and HTML. One of the reasons  
Selectors does not have a parent selector is because of big performance  
impact it would have when used without taking that into account. And  
experience with Selectors (especially the more complex Level 3) shows that  
most authors do not take performance aspects into account. Only a couple.

We have to take into account that people will do things incorrectly. It is  
pretty clear from content surveys that authors will do things incorrectly  
often in greater numbers than they do things correctly.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 13:32:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:57 GMT