W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:28:47 -0700
Message-ID: <ABC593D4A39948BCA96DFCEFB607E4E9@joe1446a4150a8>
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, <public-html@w3.org>
That is a better fallback example, if it is made clear what is 
supposed to happen if the link is selected under various conditions 
(sandboxed? or not).
Thanks and Best Regards,
Joe

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
To: <public-html@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:00 PM
Subject: ISSUE-107 plugin-fallback-example - Chairs Solicit Alternate 
Proposals or Counter-Proposals


>
> The current status for this issue:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-0107
>
> - We have a Working Group draft that includes a plugin example that 
> seems to convey an anti-plugin opinion.
> - We have a Change Proposal submitted that proposes an alternative 
> example that may be more realistic:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0395.html
>
> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit alternate Change 
> Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details), in 
> case anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different 
> change than the specific one in the existing Change Proposal.
>
> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by May 
> 20th, 2010, we proceed with a Call for Consensus on Julian's Change 
> Proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
> 
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 05:29:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:17 UTC