- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:49:15 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 15.04.2010 17:45, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 04/15/2010 11:32 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 15.04.2010 17:21, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> .. >>> If you like, you can submit separate change proposals, but each must >>> specify an actual proposal, and not a list of things that need to be >>> solved or investigated. >>> ... >> >> Ok, did so by removing the paragraph mentioning the alternative approach: >> > [snip] >> >> DETAILS >> >> Make the specified change controllers consistent. > > That removes the item to be investigated, but leaves the item to be solved. > > A change proposal must make an actual proposal. What do you propose the > change controller for text/html to be? What do you propose that the > change controller for text/html-sandboxed be? And why do you make that > specific proposal? The proposal is to make them consistent. Currently one says "W3C", and the other says "WHATWG". Are you saying the Change Proposal needs to pick one of those? Also, I'm not clear what additional rational is needed. I explained why I think they should be consistent. I think the question what the change controller for text/html should be was already discussed and resolved. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:49:55 UTC