W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-90, ISSUE-91, ISSUE-93, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96, ISSSUE-97: (new semantic elements/attributes) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:09:29 -0700
Message-ID: <r2t3b31caf91004071409tbe9cfe4doc14c51952f7275ff@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej wrote:

> - We have Change Proposals submitted that propose removing some of these:
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/removefigure
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/removeaside
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/removedetails
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/removehidden
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/removeprogress
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/removemeter

> During discussion of these proposals, very similar arguments have been
> mustered for and against the submitted proposals. The Chairs believe that a
> single counter-proposal may be sufficient to address all six of these
> issues, and are willing to accept submissions along those lines.

Agreed. As someone else mentioned, I previously volunteered to write a
zero-edit Change Proposal for ISSUE-95. I'm going to try to develop a
unified zero-edit CP for the above issues, in coordination with Tab
Atkins, Jonas Sicking, John Foliot, and whomever else is interested in
pitching in.

Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:10:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:01 UTC