- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:19:26 -0500
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Technical Architecture Group <tag@w3.org>
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:49 -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk> wrote: [...] > > This one would also render differently: > > > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > > <head><title>example document</title></head> > > <body> > > <pre> > > Arbitrary example text</pre> > > </body> > > </html> Right, that's documented in one of the pages Sam cited when he started this thread: "In HTML, a line feed that immediately follows a pre, listing or textarea start tag is ignored." -- http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/HTML_vs._XHTML Jonas seemed to be asking which of DOM/scripts, CSS/rendering, etc. fit into the requirements, and I learned something from the question and the answer, but I'm not sure I see what point you're adding, Philip. Are you just emphasizing things that were noted in Sam's message only by reference? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 19:19:29 UTC