W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:25:25 -0700
Message-ID: <63df84f0910231725w44c42bc4l3ab7f1705fff942f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Ross <tross@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Tony Ross <tross@microsoft.com> wrote:
> On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> You're actually asking two somewhat different questions:
>>
>> 1. Should HTML5 have decentralized extensibility.
>> 2. Should HTML5 provide an explicit means for others to define custom
>> elements/attributes within HTML markup.
>
> Mostly I was trying to clarify that I feel the real focus is #2.
>
>> As for 2, I don't really feel strongly. As a browser developer I like
>> the idea of every now and then being able to do experimental
>> extensions in the form of elements, the same way that we do for CSS.
>> It allows us to test features without cluttering up the namespace of
>> standardized element names. And since I'd like to see this on occasion
>> for browsers, I'd imagine that others would want to do it for other
>> things.
>
> I feel those who would benefit most are the non-browser developers, such as script library authors.

But script library authors have showed fairly well that they can live
in the same namespace without causing collisions. These libraries tend
to add functions both to the global object, and on various DOM objects
such as Nodes and XMLHttpRequest. So far I have not heard that
collisions have been a big problem.

/ Jonas
Received on Saturday, 24 October 2009 00:26:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:50 GMT