W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:50:34 +0200
To: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Tony Ross" <tross@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u11pukey64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:45:25 +0200, Shelley Powers  
<shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> The use of class names is moot, because they don't provide a process
> whereby we can ensure that there are no name clashes with class names.
> There is nothing decentralized, or distributed when it comes to the
> use of class names. I think we're heading off on a tangent in this
> discussion.

Class names can be a URI (and are therefore unique enough as far as I can  
tell) and for the case of widgets implemented in JavaScript it does not  
seem that much more complexity is needed really.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 11:51:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:53 UTC