W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:50:34 +0200
To: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Tony Ross" <tross@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u11pukey64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:45:25 +0200, Shelley Powers  
<shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> The use of class names is moot, because they don't provide a process
> whereby we can ensure that there are no name clashes with class names.
> There is nothing decentralized, or distributed when it comes to the
> use of class names. I think we're heading off on a tangent in this
> discussion.

Class names can be a URI (and are therefore unique enough as far as I can  
tell) and for the case of widgets implemented in JavaScript it does not  
seem that much more complexity is needed really.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 11:51:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:50 GMT