W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation)

From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:04:53 -0400
Message-ID: <7c2a12e20910070804y5065f858ve06ec36eba94869a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Incorrect. Many URIs can identify the same XXXX.

Then I'm not understanding here.  In what sense are those XXXXs then
"the same", if their URLs differ?

> If that is a good thing, why aren't we changing stuff like:
>
>> A DOCTYPE must consist of the following characters, in this order:
>>
>>   1. A U+003C LESS-THAN SIGN (<) character.
>>   2. A U+0021 EXCLAMATION MARK (!) character.
>>   3. A string that is an ASCII case-insensitive match for the string
>> "DOCTYPE".
>>   4. One or more space characters.
>>   5. A string that is an ASCII case-insensitive match for the string
>> "HTML".
>>   6. Optionally, a DOCTYPE legacy string (defined below).
>>   7. Zero or more space characters.
>>   8. A U+003E GREATER-THAN SIGN (>) character.
>
> ???

I don't know.  That could certainly be made a lot more concise without
sacrificing precision.
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 15:05:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:50 GMT