W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:49:48 +0100
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Larry Masinter" <masinter@adobe.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <81974ED8-7D20-4869-BA13-B4CD8A962565@googlemail.com>
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>

On 28 May 2009, at 15:39, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:

> I can't find any reference to Technorati looking in the archives

annevk just pointed this out to me on IRC: <http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070829#l-229 
 >.

In short, at least in August 2007, Technorati took whatever they  
received (regardless of MIME type) and ran the algorithm for "feed or  
HTML" from the Content-Type sniffing section, and ignored anything  
that didn't from that come out as a feed.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>
<http://simplepie.org/>
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 14:50:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:37 GMT