W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:18:11 -0500
Message-ID: <643cc0270905280618r657f3c9ele3e620d16c18e50b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> Lots of great discussion on XMLLiteral handling and general thoughts on
> HTML+RDFa and XHTML+RDFa harmonization. I've gathered the main points
> made throughout this thread here:
>
> http://rdfa.info/wiki/rdfa-in-html-requirements
>
> There are a number of contradictory statements on the page. I have tried
> to capture ALL suggestions on requirements, design philosophy, and
> solutions regarding the harmonization of (X)HTML+RDFa.
>
> Toby, Henri, Smylers, Philip, Shelley, Ivan, Shane and Ian - please add
> anything I missed in your e-mails to the wiki page.



It looks fairly comprehensive to me.  I would be more comfortable if folks
who have implemented JavaScript libraries to work with RDFa were directly
involved in this discussion. They (Jeni Tennison, Mark Birbeck, and Ben
Adida) would have more insight into the implementation problems.

In fact, that's my biggest concern: that discussions should occur directly
between RDFa and HTML5 folks are not happening, happening offline, or
snarkily, in IRC (
http://lastweekinhtml5.blogspot.com/2009/05/rdfa-guys-wake-up-and-smell-pilgrims.html).



Shelley
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 13:18:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:03 UTC