W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:00:20 -0700
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <A061131D-BE3E-4379-991C-083C57AB107B@apple.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>

On May 26, 2009, at 5:23 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:

> Agree.
> I notice the option for the chair to re-open the discussion if new  
> information is presented. I'm assuming this would include taking a  
> new vote on the document.
> In light of the objections given in this longish discussion thread,  
> and what seems to have been a lack of addressing such objections,  
> properly, from the first vote, I believe that Sam Ruby and Chris  
> Wilson should re-open this topic, formally--including taking a new  
> vote on the document, and handling any new objections that arise  
> using the proper procedure.
> I don't think this would be an onerous burden on the working group,  
> would it?

I don't have a problem with holding another vote. However, raising  
objections or citing problems doesn't have to be tied to a survey. If  
you have comments you would like to make, then feel free to do so in  
email to the list.

I think it would make more sense to just field any outstanding  
comments, including new ones that come in, and then take a WG decision  
about publishing the document as a WG Note. In the meantime hopefully  
we can publish new Working Drafts as appropriate.

Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 17:00:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:45 UTC