Re: RDFa in HTML issues wiki page created

Manu Sporny wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Shane's document is definitely a promising start.  It, however, does not
>> address the questions that Philip posted on 14 May[1], nor has anybody
>> stepped forward to answer such questions.  
>>
>> To my mind, there is a bigger concern that the types of questions that
>> Philip raised on 14 May[1] are not being addressed.  If we get to the
>> point that such questions are at least acknowledged promptly and then
>> actively worked, I am confident that fragmentation will not occur.
> 
> Philip's questions, along with Julian's comment, have been acknowledged
> and wikified:
> 
> http://rdfa.info/wiki/rdfa-in-html-issues
> 
> I will request an agenda item to discuss them during the next RDFa Task
> Force telecon.
> 
> I have probably missed some issues that have been noted via the mailing
> list related to Shane or Philip's documents. Please edit the wiki and
> add any outstanding questions/issues (using the same template as the
> other questions).
> 
> Does this help move the discussion forward?

Very much so.  Thanks!

> -- manu

- Sam Ruby