W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

RE: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:32:25 -0700
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118CD8A4812@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>
Ah, sorry. Thanks for clarifying.


--
http://larry.masinter.net


-----Original Message-----
From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 1:26 PM
To: Larry Masinter; Sam Ruby; HTML WG
Subject: RE: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]

At 13:13  -0700 22/05/09, Larry Masinter wrote:
>DSinger argued for why doing so was a good principle.

no, I merely volunteered an alternative way of saying what I thought 
I heard (and wrote it in the log), so as to be clear what was being 
discussed:

>  >>   <dsinger> i.e. if something has been previously specified, but
>  >>   failed to make a cowpath, then it should be de-considered
>>>
>  >>   <dsinger> the above is NOT a stated principle but it seems to be
>  >>   used as such

-- 
David Singer
Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 20:33:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:37 GMT