W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:57:41 -0700
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <CC64B6BA-1E64-420E-8B0B-79BA02AC5889@apple.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

On May 22, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> I read these minutes and I was unable to discern a decision among  
>> the options I proposed:
>> 1) Mark up examples more clearly as such in the Design Principles  
>> document.
>> 2) Delete all examples from the Design Principles document.
>> 3) Something else if neither of these options is acceptable.
>> I will do #1 unless I hear otherwise in the next few days.
> The general perception I got from the call was that this document  
> was useful as a historical guide, and as a Working Draft, and it  
> should remain as such as some people find it helpful (others may  
> not), but should not progress any further.
> But as you were not present on the call, no decision was made.   
> David Singer volunteered to get with you.

I think the flaw identified in the document should be fixed, even if  
it remains a Working Draft. Would anyone like to make an argument for  
not fixing it? Or for doing something other than my proposed remedy?

Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 21:58:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:25:30 UTC