W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies"

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 19:46:22 +0200
Message-ID: <4A16E4EE.9070403@gmx.de>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
>> I note there was no feedback on this. Does silence mean agreement here?
> 
> While I didn't mention your email by name, the question you pose here is 
> an example of the one that I talked about here:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0161.html
> ...

I knew you'd say that :-)

>> In the meantime, the "spec" also contains instructions how to convert 
>> HTML to Atom, and a section about BibTeX (!).
>>
>> I have no problem with people trying to specify this *somewhere*, but 
>> I do have a big issue with this being done in HTML5.
> 
> This needs to be resolved prior to Last Call.  For now, lets focus on 
> the content not the container.
> ...

Actually, I don't have the energy nor the time to focus on the content 
(maybe for one of the formats, but now there are already four). It 
shouldn't be there in the first place.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 17:47:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:37 GMT