- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 05:34:39 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On May 20, 2009, at 3:46 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > 3) The issue about what the document itself is named (raised by Roy > Fielding[2]) is also something that needs to be resolved. This > issue primarily affects the title page and little else. The title of the document is not a technical issue, so I don't think we need to give a great deal of consideration to minority objectors. Particularly when the proposed alternative is (a) inaccurate on the face of it; (b) intended to downplay the value of the spec. I think we should let the spec be titled by people who are generally in agreement with its technical direction, and then assess consensus on its technical contents, rather than changing the title to suit the preferences of those who disagree with the contents. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 12:35:20 UTC