List tone

Disclaimer: This is a personal note, intentionally not calling out any names.

With recent threads I started wondering if there is a chance that
people could focus more on providing the Working Group and the editor
with feedback that is targeted and constructive, ideally including
data to support key points?

I am especially concerned about the tone in certain discussions. It
seems some—admittedly: less than two—people on the list disrespect
members of the Working Group in such a way that the substance of their
mails borders personal attacks.

Recognizing some passion in these contributions too I think that
focusing on things that matter could go a long way. Waiting a moment
before replying, taking the time to check if messages could be
misunderstood in any way, and disagreeing appropriately [1] may all be
things that are useful.


Thanks,
 Jens.


[1] http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html

-- 
Jens Meiert
http://meiert.com/en/