On Jun 26, 2009, at 05:42 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Does anyone agree with the inclusion of the microdata section? I have yet to properly kick the tyres on it, but so far I like what I've seen and think that it should be in. It certainly is an interesting extension point, enough that I'm looking into changing some of the XML formats I use to XHTML5+microdata. I have some minor nits, such as that it should be PropertyNodeList.content*s* to avoid some confusion, and that it looks like getItems() should be part of the API as most of the examples seem to need it, but I certainly don't think they're show-stoppers. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 09:05:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:38 GMT