Laura Carlson wrote: > Sam wrote: > >> Data > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE#head-46654c194f99ed943eb26573a6506818962826ee > >> reason > > Rationale: Why Summary Should Be Provided > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE#head-222af24a2b1dcdc3afe5e3036551b70f99cf232c > > Rationale: Why Summary Should Not Be Provided > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE#head-2046cf917919f6d17e0ee7990238686702c17523 > >> use cases > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE#head-4fd8f8462033b251ea8328b598d9482140ff3f1f > >> potential long term solutions > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE#head-7e7bb8bc3b97dcfae6a5505e462027377b505834 This is all good stuff. I remembered @summary => @aria-described-by => summary, but either forgotten or never fully understood that @aria-described by was not an appropriate solution. Question: is there consensus on a summary element being the right long-term solution? If so, what is in the critical path to making that happen? Why is @summary now so important to making that happen? > Best Regards, > Laura > > -- > Laura L. Carlson - Sam RubyReceived on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 17:30:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:38 GMT