W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2009

Re: WG review of HTML5

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0906191705580.16244@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > As you may be aware, yesterday I wrote a blog post encouraging people to
> > review the HTML5 spec. [1]
> > 
> > This effort is intended to support a more thorough linear scan, week by
> > week, section by section, through the HTML5 draft, which the chairs will be
> > conducting in this working group from April through July in advance of the
> > goal of reaching "Last Call" in October.
> 
> It may be helpful to do this iteratively, particularly as this document has
> not been developed using the traditional W3C approach.  In particular, it
> probably makes sense to discuss the following two items further because
> depending on how they get resolved, much work can be saved:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Apr/0001.html
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478665#c1

Could I request a report from the chairs summarising the conclusions that 
have been drawn from the past two months of discussions on the above 
topics? I am a big fan of saving work, so if it was concluded that work 
could be saved I would be much pleased.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 17:08:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:04 UTC