W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Proposed amends to <small> element

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:26:14 +0000
Message-ID: <4971CE66.8020607@splintered.co.uk>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Bruce Lawson wrote:

> I suggest that <small> be allowed to surround block level elements, 
> because  a list of caveats, or two paragraphs, may legitimately be 
> legalese and worthy of the <small> tag.
> 
> I think that a spec should avoid arbitarary distinctions such as element 
> x is intended only for "short" content; who defines "short"?

Unless we want to define a <blocksmall> *ducks*

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Saturday, 17 January 2009 12:26:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:28 GMT