Re: Proposed amends to <small> element

Bruce Lawson wrote:

> I suggest that <small> be allowed to surround block level elements, 
> because  a list of caveats, or two paragraphs, may legitimately be 
> legalese and worthy of the <small> tag.
> 
> I think that a spec should avoid arbitarary distinctions such as element 
> x is intended only for "short" content; who defines "short"?

Unless we want to define a <blocksmall> *ducks*

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________