On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:28:10 +0100, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> Well, a) this DOCTYPE gives quirks mode in Firefox so is not an option >> anyway and b) we are having this discussion because of compatibility >> with XML tools; surely we can assume their serializers are not so messed >> up that they cannot generate the well-formed <!DOCTYPE html>, but can >> generate the non well-formed <!DOCTYPE html "">? > > Why would you generate !DOCTYPE in XHTML content at all? Where does XHTML come from? Nobody mentioned XHTML. As far as I know this thread is about compatibility with XML tools that try to output HTML but cannot output <!DOCTYPE html> for one reason or another. > And I don't think that anyone is proposing use of <!DOCTYPE html ""> > which is > incompatible with everything. In light of this comment I do not understand your previous e-mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jan/0151.html -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 13:33:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:25 GMT