- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:09:33 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Jim Jewett wrote: > > The current algorithm to determine script type is much clearer. > Remaining comments: > > (1) I would further clarify the last paragraph (of > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#script rule 1) > > "Otherwise, the element has a language attribute" > to > "Otherwise, the element has a non-empty language attribute" Done. > (2) Is there any meaning to @language if there is a @type present? > If not, this may be worth making explicit, even beyond just not > listing @language in the content model. Done. > (3) I would include an explicit example of > <script type="" language="mylang"> > showing that mylang is ignored, even for an empty (but present) @type. I'd rather not add examples of non-conforming markup, at least not until we have a lot of examples of conforming markup. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 01:18:31 UTC