W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: frameset-ok as flag vs. insertion mode

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:12:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0902232210240.6186@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why frameset-ok is defined as a flag instead of being 
> defined as a insertion mode between 'after head' and 'in body'?

Is it equivalent? I was reluctant to split the "in body" mode in two, with 
one mode basically just forwarding everything to the other mode, so I 
didn't really check to see if it would have worked. For example, how would 
you handle the switch to and from the "in CDATA" mode, without yet another 
way of keeping track which mode we came from?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 22:12:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:01 UTC