W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

frameset-ok as flag vs. insertion mode

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:48:21 +0200
Message-Id: <0394C500-AC9F-44D0-86FB-5852F585A860@iki.fi>
To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>

Is there a reason why frameset-ok is defined as a flag instead of  
being defined as a insertion mode between 'after head' and 'in body'?

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 14:49:03 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Use and abuse of @summary"
Previous message: Leif Halvard Silli: "Re: Use and abuse of @summary"
Next in thread: Ian Hickson: "Re: frameset-ok as flag vs. insertion mode"
Reply: Ian Hickson: "Re: frameset-ok as flag vs. insertion mode"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:28 GMT