W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary"

From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:30:22 +0000
Message-ID: <499C379E.7010002@cfit.ie>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote:
> If I don't hear anything from the PF WG by the time
> Sam send the agenda for this tomorrow's teleconference,
> I suppose we should postpone discussion to next week; that
> would be a shame; I thought we were so close.
> 
> ISSUE-31 (missing-alt): What to do when a reasonable text equivalent is
> unknown/unavailable?
> 
>       * ACTION-98 on Gregory Rosmaita: Discuss missing-alt with the WAI
>         CG and report back - due 2009-02-18 - pending review

We will be discussing the @alt issue today on the WAI CG call. We may be
in a position to talk about the issue in more detail on the HTML call
tomorrow, but that is dependent on the outputs from the meeting today.

Cheers

Josh
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 16:31:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:31 GMT