W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary"

From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:00:45 -0800
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <1FCD583A-C20B-475C-94CF-2976005B53A5@apple.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>


On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> Did we just achieve consensus between the HTML and the PFWG
> on ISSUE-31 missing-alt?
>
> i.e. James, are you pretty sure the rest of the PF WG agrees
> with you?

I can't speak for group consensus on the matter b/c that issue wasn't  
taken to a vote. I did report the change back to the group though, so  
they are aware of the new note.

> Matt May, Chaals, etc. is Ian's position close enough
> to your own? It works for me. Do we have 3 independent parties
> in agreement, I wonder?
>
> (FWIW, editorially, I like the suggestion of
> 3 Feb 2009 08:47:11 +0200 to include the two by three table)

Ditto.
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 04:01:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:01 UTC