On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 01:35 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: [...] > > Finally, what's the point in closing issue 54 and opening a new one > > instead? > > > Hmm, I thought issues could not be renamed, but I was wrong. Would you > be ok with renaming this issue from: "doctype-legacy-compat - tools > that can't generate <!DOCTYPE html>" to "about-scheme - about URI > scheme needs to be registered" I think it's worthwhile to document the resolution of the original doctype-legacy-compat issue, so I have a mild preference for making a new issue rather than renaming this one. Meanwhile, as I said in another message, I prefer recording doctype-legacy-compat resolved contingent on registration of about: and moving it to pending-review (which should not block last call, but would block PR). -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Friday, 21 August 2009 18:33:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT