W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Recording teleconferences?

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:23:51 -0500
Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0908141023g5dbc2d8esa894b36fd8f761dc@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Dan wrote:

>>> Well, then there are the social/policy questions.

I wrote:

>> Also the question of providing alternatives
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#media-equiv
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/G158

Lachlan wrote:

> We will still have the minutes as usual, but the advantage of having a
> recording would be that they could be more easily revised later for
> accuracy.  I don't think it would be essential to have a word for word
> transcript though, but somewhere between that and the poor quality minutes
> we have today would be good.

As an aid to the scribe, a recording could be helpful after the fact
to repair minutes.

But if a full recording is offered to the public it is only equitable
to offer a full transcript for people who do not have the option to

If you're deaf, hard of hearing, deaf-blind you'll be locked out of
full content. The guidance therefore, according to the Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines, is to provide a transcript.

Best Regards,

Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 17:24:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:49 UTC