- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > I don't entirely agree, but it's better than nothing. Here's what I would > propose: > > 1) The issue was raised at least two months ago, by one of email, bugzilla or > the issue tracker. > AND > 2) There has been no mutually satisfactory satisfactory outcome. > AND > 3) There is an open issue in the issue tracker indicating this. > > (I originally said 6 months, but 2 months seems like a reasonable timeline.) I prefer 6 months than 2 months because in practice many issues have been open more than 2 months simply because I hadn't gotten to the relevant feedback yet. Sometimes it takes even longer, e.g. just earlier this afternoon I responded to some mail from 2007 and 2008, but I think 6 months would be a relatively good average and would ensure we don't end up with issues that are so new that I haven't even looked at them yet. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 00:55:47 UTC