W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [DRAFT] Heartbeat poll - update 6 - on to implementation

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:10:42 -0700
Message-ID: <63df84f0908101610n62e6d3b0r63fcc79fd981d26@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> Or is the answer something altogether different given that this is
>> just a poll and not a formal vote?
>
> We are at the point where I am simply going to make an informed decision and
> proceed based on the results of this poll.  That decision will not be
> binding on any future decision.  For example, no matter what the outcome, it
> does not mean that summary couldn't become either fully conforming or fully
> non-conforming in subsequent Working Drafts.

Oh, I just realized that one option is to simply publish Manu's draft
in order to fulfill the heartbeat requirement, but then continue
business as usual with Ian's document published as editors drafts. At
the time of the next heartbeat (or anytime before that) we'll decide
again which document to publish.

The reason I'm asking was that it honestly wasn't clear to me what we
were actually having the poll on. It was a bit clearer to me when the
discussion was solely around multiple parallel documents, such as
Manu's HTML5+RDFa document as well as Mikes H:TML document (which btw
has an awesome abbreviated name)

/ Jonas
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 23:11:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:43 GMT