- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:12:31 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > Shelley Powers wrote: >> How do we get permission to raise issues in the HTML WG issues >> tracker again? >> >> Do we need to connect up with you, Michael? Sam told me once, but I >> can't remember the procedure. > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/new > > Note: I consider an action to be open if I believe that somebody is > actually working on the issue, i.e., undertaking an activity that I > believe will ultimately result in concrete spec text. > > In cases where Ian believes that the case is closed, that means > somebody who is ready, willing and able to provide spec text. > > As a concrete example, Ian appears to believe that the summary issue > is closed (I based this on Ian's use of the word "reopen" in this > email: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0417.html). I > believe that it is open as Cynthia is actively working with others to > produce a draft for the WG to discuss. > >> Thanks >> >> Shelley > > - Sam Ruby > > It's evident that the issue of metadata is being handled, specifically in another working group, the RDFa Working Group. I would say it fits within your criteria. Shelley
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 17:13:15 UTC